AI 速览

  • SRAM RED AXS E1 (2024) groupset: ~2,101 g (disc, no PM) — lightest 12-speed wireless road groupset. ~$4,250. Carbon cranks/cage/levers, ceramic pulley bearings, HollowPin chain, brake contact-point adjust
  • Force AXS (2025 E1 update): ~2,522 g, ~$2,850 — copies RED's architecture (carbon cage, 14T lower jockey, Orbit damper) at 60% of the cost. The value pick in the SRAM lineup
  • Rival AXS (2025 E1): ~2,712 g, ~$1,950 — cheapest wireless electronic road groupset. Aluminum cranks (with cutouts), mechanically sprung clutch (no Orbit), single-sided power meter only
  • All three tiers use the same AXS wireless protocol and are cross-compatible: mix Rival derailleur with RED shifters, pair 1×13 XPLR with 2×12 road. UDH required for the XPLR Full Mount derailleur
  • SRAM vs Shimano: SRAM is 1-finger braking (repositioned lever pivot), wider cassette range (10-36T vs 11-34T), and 1× options Shimano doesn't offer. Shimano shifts marginally faster and is lighter at the top end
由 AI 辅助提炼——完整背景请阅读全文。

/ 01

What AXS changed and what the E1 update means

AXS is SRAM's umbrella brand for its wireless electronic components — every AXS derailleur pairs to every AXS shifter over encrypted 2.4 GHz, no junction boxes, no internal batteries, no wires. Each derailleur runs on its own rechargeable battery (clip-on for road, integrated for XPLR Transmission). Shifters run on CR2032 coin cells that last ~6 months.

The E1 designation (2024-2025) is the current generation. E1 RED launched May 2024; E1 Force and Rival followed June 2025. The E1 update is significant: Force and Rival adopted RED's hood ergonomics, brake geometry (repositioned pivot for 1-finger braking), and derailleur architecture. The D1/D2 numbers you'll see on discount sites are the previous generation — lighter ergonomics, older brake feel, but functionally still AXS.

/ 02

Groupset total weights (disc brake, 2×12, E1 generation)

SRAM E1 2×12 groupset weights — same measurement methodology across tiers (no power meter, 172.5 mm cranks, 48/35 chainrings, 160 mm Center Lock rotors)

ComponentRED AXS E1Force AXS E1Rival AXS E1
Crankset (48/35, 172.5 mm)689 g748 g844 g
Rear derailleur (no battery)262 g328 g366 g
Front derailleur (no battery)145 g182 g182 g
Cassette (10-28T RED / 10-30T)545 g748 g282 g
Shift/brake system L+R (with hoses, calipers, pads)180+180 g273 g282 g
Chain (114 links)232 g242 g266 g
Brake calipers (pair)141 g each116 g each118 g each
Bottom bracket (BSA)24 g each24 g each24 g each
Battery (×2, charged)
TOTAL (disc, no PM)~2,101 g~2,522 g~2,712 g
TOTAL (with spindle PM)~2,496 g~2,776 g~2,993 g

/ 03

Cranks & Chainrings

SRAM uses a 1-piece direct-mount crank with a DUB 28.99 mm spindle — incompatible with Shimano's 24 mm Hollowtech II BBs (you need a DUB-specific BB). RED uses hollow carbon arms co-developed with Zipp; Force uses solid carbon; Rival uses aluminum arms with a machined cutout that saves ~50 g over solid alloy. The new XPLR 1× cranks use a Threadmount spider-chainring interface (replaceable rings).

Chainring sizes: RED offers 50/37, 48/35, 46/33 (the 50/37 is the aero option for crit/TT). Force offers 48/35, 46/33. Rival offers 46/33 plus three meter-kit options. 1× road: 40T up to 50T for RED XPLR. The 48/35 chainring is the most common 2× road size across all three tiers.

Crankset comparison (E1)

SpecRED AXSForce AXSRival AXS
Arm materialHollow carbon (Zipp layup)Solid carbonAluminum with cutout
SpindleDUB 28.99 mmDUB 28.99 mmDUB 28.99 mm
Weight (48/35, 172.5 mm)689 g748 g844 g
2× chainring options50/37, 48/35, 46/3348/35, 46/3346/33 + meter kits
1× chainring range (XPLR)40–50T42–50T38–46T
Crank lengths160, 165, 167.5, 170, 172.5, 175 mm160, 165, 170, 172.5, 175 mm160, 165, 170, 172.5, 175 mm
Power meter optionQuarq spindle (dual-sided)Quarq spindle (single or dual)Quarq spindle (single-sided only)
Approx. retail (USD, with PM)~$1,650~$900~$500

/ 04

Cassettes

SRAM road cassettes mount on XDR freehubs (not Shimano HG). The 10T smallest cog is what lets SRAM achieve a wider overall range than Shimano's 11T-start cassettes. All four ranges — 10-28T, 10-30T, 10-33T, 10-36T — are available across all three tiers, giving sub-1:1 gearing even at the entry tier. RED's XG-1250 is a single-block machined XDome cassette (lightest); Force uses a 4-cog block + pinned steel; Rival is fully pinned steel (heaviest, longest-lasting).

The XPLR 1×13 cassettes are a different beast: 10-46T single block, 13 speeds, only fits XDR. These require the XPLR Full Mount derailleur (UDH frame). The 13-speed chain is a different Flattop variant — not cross-compatible with 12-speed Flattop.

Cassette comparison

SpecXG-1250 (RED)XG-1270 (Force)XG-1230 (Rival)
Weight (10-30T)232 g273 g282 g
ConstructionSingle-block XDome machined steelHybrid: 4-cog steel block + pinnedFully pinned steel
Available ranges10-28, 10-30, 10-33, 10-36T10-28, 10-30, 10-33, 10-36T10-28, 10-30, 10-33, 10-36T
XPLR 1×13 (10-46T) weight~330 g~360 g~390 g
FreehubXDRXDRXDR
Approx. retail (USD, 10-30T)$380$200$120

/ 05

Derailleurs

The rear derailleur is where SRAM's tier differences are most visible. RED and Force both use the Orbit fluid damper (chain tension management for rough roads) and a 14T lower jockey wheel. Rival uses a mechanically sprung clutch — functional, slightly less refined. RED adds ceramic bearings to both jockey wheels; Force uses steel. All three are 12-speed Flattop compatible and rebuildable.

Front derailleur: RED officially goes to 56/43T chainrings; Force and Rival top out at 50T. All are wedge-mounted braze-on (with frame-specific clamps for round tubes). The 56T max on RED is what makes the 50/37 and 56/43 chainring options possible — only RED supports those.

Rear derailleur comparison

SpecRED AXSForce AXSRival AXS
Weight (no battery)262 g328 g366 g
Max cassette (Flattop road)10-36T10-36T10-36T
Lower jockey wheel14T (ceramic bearings)14T (steel bearings)12T (steel bearings)
Chain managementOrbit fluid damperOrbit fluid damperMechanical clutch
Cage materialCarbon fiberCarbon outer linkAluminum
RebuildableYesYesYes
XPLR Full Mount option (UDH)Yes (1×13)Yes (1×13)Yes (1×13)
BatteryClip-on rechargeable (shared with FD)SameSame
Approx. retail (USD)$770$480$330

/ 06

Brakes: the SRAM differentiator

SRAM's 2024-2025 brake update is the biggest functional story across the three tiers. By repositioning the brake lever pivot, SRAM increased leverage enough to claim true 1-finger braking — meaningfully less hand force for the same stopping power than Shimano's servo-wave system. All three tiers got this update. RED adds brake contact-point (bite point) adjustment; Force and Rival have reach adjust only.

Brake fluid is DOT 5.1 (NOT Shimano's mineral oil — never mix). SRAM uses the Stealthamajig hose fitting (simpler than Shimano's banjo). Pads are SRAM A1/A2 sintered or organic — cross-compatible across Red/Force/Rival calipers. Rotors are Center Lock or 6-bolt; SRAM's own Paceline A2 rotors are 160 mm = ~95 g, comparable to Shimano RT-CL900.

Brake comparison (E1 generation)

SpecRED AXSForce AXSRival AXS
Caliper weight (each)141 g116 g118 g
Lever blade materialCarbonComposite (carbon-reinforced)Aluminum
Reach adjustYes (tool-free)Yes (tool-free)Yes (tool-free)
Contact-point (bite) adjustYesNoNo
1-finger braking geometryYes (repositioned pivot)YesYes
Caliper mountFlat MountFlat MountFlat Mount
Brake fluidDOT 5.1DOT 5.1DOT 5.1
Hose fittingStealthamajigStealthamajigStealthamajig
Rotor sizes140, 160, 180 mm140, 160, 180 mm140, 160, 180 mm

/ 07

Chains

All SRAM road AXS groupsets use the Flattop chain — the rollers are larger than Shimano's, and the chain is directional (logos face outboard). Flattop chains work across all three tiers and across 2×12 and 1×13 XPLR. The 13-speed XPLR chain is a separate Flattop variant though — don't mix 12 and 13 speed.

RED uses HollowPin construction (hollowed rivets for ~13 g weight savings) with advanced plating. Force has solid pins with plate cutouts. Rival uses solid pins, no cutouts. All include a Flattop PowerLock (reusable quick-link).

Chain comparison (114 links)

SpecRED FlattopForce FlattopRival Flattop
Weight232 g242 g266 g
Pin constructionHollowPinSolid (plate cutouts)Solid
Quick-linkPowerLock (reusable)PowerLock (reusable)PowerLock (reusable)
FinishSilver or iridescentSilver or purpleSilver
Speeds12 (road 2×), 13 (XPLR separate chain)12, 13 separate12, 13 separate
Approx. retail (USD)$70$50$35

/ 08

SRAM vs Shimano: the honest comparison

Weight: at the top tier, Shimano Dura-Ace R9200 (~2,058 g) is ~40 g lighter than SRAM RED AXS E1 (~2,101 g). At the entry tier, the gap flips — SRAM Rival (~2,712 g) is ~150 g lighter than Shimano 105 (~2,562 g... actually heavier). SRAM wins the entry tier, Shimano wins the top tier, by slim margins either way.

Shifting: Shimano's Di2 shifts marginally faster and with a more definitive click. SRAM's AXS shifts are softer, slightly slower, but the wireless setup is dramatically simpler to install and the AXS app gives much more customization (sequential shifting, multi-shift, blip mapping).

Braking: SRAM's 1-finger geometry is a real, felt advantage — less hand fatigue on long descents. Shimano's servo-wave is more initial bite but more hand force. Both excellent; SRAM edges it for feel.

Range: SRAM's 10T-start cassettes give wider range (10-36T = 360% range) vs Shimano's 11T-start (11-34T = 309%). For climbing, SRAM. 1× options exist only on SRAM. Di2 vs AXS battery life is similar (~60 h per charge).

Ecosystem: Shimano's Di2 is closed (Shimano shifters, Shimano derailleurs, Shimano app). SRAM's AXS is more open — works with third-party blips, the AXS Web dashboard, and is more friendly to mixed builds. Shimano is more polished; SRAM is more flexible.

/ 来源

资料与延伸阅读

END /继续阅读 →